Monday, August 13, 2012

Lucia Hartini -- Spying Lens




Composition:

In the foreground,  there is a figure trapped within the zig-zag walls, wrapped in blue cloth that flows around in the painting, soft and fluid. The cool color blue contrasts with the warm orange and red color that dominates the painting. The blue color may represent water while the red color represents fire, there fore creating this conflict in the colors, making the painting look as if there will not be peace, contrasting again with the peaceful expression of the figure. The figure entrapped within the walls, lies in a vulnerable foetal position. The orange dominates the painting, reinforcing the feeling of being trapped, restrained and supressed. The figure, who i think, represents lucia hartini herself, is wrapped in the color blue. Slowly, the zig-zag wall stretches through the mid ground to the background of the painting. The ridgid red walls contrasts with the fluidity of the blue cloth. The cracks on the wall may show something coming apart, crashing or just old age. There is also a section of the wall that collapsed which may show break-through or destruction. There are also creepy eyes floating in parts of the painting, projecting colored lights towards the figure, making it the centre of attention.  Creeping through the walls, towards the figure are white mists that diffuses through the walls from the background. In the background, it is dark with red mists, creating an ominous mood in the painting. On the right side of the painting, the background is in complete darkness while on the other side, there seems to be some red light shining upon the mist or clouds. However, this red light makes the dark background look even more eerie. The cracking ground in the foreground transforms into the dark endless sky making it look like a endless fall if you step beyond the walls that confines the figure.  These areas gives the viewer a chance to imagine what lies beyond the painting and uses the viewer's imagination to create strong images that can translate to fear, panic or distress.

Painting style:

The brushwork in the painting are well blended and this makes the painting very realistic despite the impossible setting. When the impossible or surreal setting is depicted in a very realistic anger, it allows the viewer to be more attracted to the painting. It allows the viewer to place themselves within the painting and imagine what it would be like. In Lucia's brushwork, she brings out the fluidity ( seen in the smooth flow of the fabric) and the rigidity ( the firm zig zag walls).  The flowing draping fabric and the hard solid brick walls brings out a stark contrast. It embodies the situation Lucia is in. The harsh criticism and the skeptical looks of the society against her vulnerable self. 
She also uses much contrast within her painting like the one mentioned above and also the use of colors. Like the warm orange contrasting with the cool blue. The contrast is like fire and water. 
The contrast of the pitch dark mysterious space with the brighter red clouds or mists.
There is the contrast of the rigid and fluid and the warm and cool, the unknowing and known, creating a uneasy feel in the painting.

Principles of design:

The figures and subject matters are more or less simplified slightly, where the figure had the basic necessary features for it to look real and believable same with the cloth, where the folds are simple yet a little realistic. The subject matters are mostly proportionate and realistic.
The lines in the painting stands out the most. The first and the one that stands out the most is the line created by the brick walls. The lines lead the viewer's eye movement in a zig zag motion through the painting. Looking at the painting in more detail, the lines created by the cracks allow us to scrutinize the details in the painting, leading us bit by bit in to the painting. Then there are the lines created by the shadows.  The one under the figure leads us from the foreground to the figure then to the dark endless sky in the background. Then the line that contrasts with the rigid lines created by the walls is the fluid lines of the blue fabric. It flows across the painting then disappears and appears again. This leads us in a different path to look at the painting.  The blue fabric leads us in two paths diagonally across the painting. Despite areas in the painting are confined by the wall, the painting seem like a never-ending setting where the painting just depicts on part of what Lucia sees. 

Symbolism:

There are many symbols within the painting.  To avoid more scrutiny, her works are heavily symbol-laden. It allows her to express her anger and frustration.
The figure represents her angry and suppressed about gender discrimination in her society and the walls shows that she is trapped and restrained. The smog that seeps between the brick walls and encroaches upon the women shows how society discriminates against women is like to Lucia. The blue represents power as female warriors who protected the sultans wore it.  However the woman's vulnerable and powerless posture makes her donning of a blue dress not powerful at all. Her choice of blue would better suggest sadness or maybe she would like to see herself become a strong female warrior in time to come. The aggressively zigzagged hard brick walls would represent how Lucia feels confined in real life as a woman, while the floating eyes would symbolize the scrutinizing, judging and doubtful eyes of the society. The watchful eyes are supposed to look frightening and eerie. The beam from the eye is like the beam of scrutiny from society which the figure, her, cowers from.

Compare:
Compare with Frida Kahlo --- The two Fridas, 1939

Background:
  Shortly after her divorce from Diego Rivera, Frida completed this self-portrait of two different personalities. In her diary, Frida writes that this painting originated from her memory of an imaginary childhood friend. Later she admitted it records the emotions surrounding her separation and martial crisis. On the right, the part of her person which was respected and loved by Diego, is the Mexican Frida in Tehuana costume. In her hand she holds an amulet bearing the portrait of Diego as a child. On the left, a more rather European Frida in a lacy white Victorian wedding dress, the Frida that Diego abandoned. The hearts of the two women lie exposed, a device Frida often used to express her pain. The unloved Frida's heart is broken while the other Frida's heart is whole. From the amulet that Frida is holding springs a vein that travels through both women's hearts and is finally cut off by the surgical pincers held in the lap of the rejected Frida. In despair, Frida tries to stop the flow of blood from Diego but it keeps dripping…she is in danger of bleeding to death. The stormy sky filled with agitated clouds may reflect Frida's inner turmoil. Holding her own hand, she is her only companion.
   The painting consists of very fine and well-blended brushstrokes just like Lucia's. In both paintings, it depicts the painter themselves and also tells the viewer their inner emotions. In this painting, the two Fridas sit confidently but with the absence of emotion, still and motionless looking straight at the viewer. The painting is dominated by Black, grey and white color. The dash of stronger color of blue, yellow and green tilts the overall visual balance of the painting making the right side appear heavier. The image is surreal where realistic subject matters are placed in a unrealistic or impossible setting or situation. The background shows high resemblance to Rene Magritte's Personal Values where she also used the sky as a background on the walls of the room. 
  Comparing this to Lucia Hartini's work, both artists uses the background and also surrounding subject matters like walls to express their emotions of anger, pain or distress.  Both artists depicted themselves in the painting as the most direct representation of themselves in their paintings. However for Frida, despite the problems and pain faced by her, she still depicts herself strong and confident with dignity whereas Lucia depicts her self vulnerable weak and powerless. In Frida's work, through the image of the broken heart, we can directly relate and understand that she went through some heart break. So we can conclude that she used direct symbols as compared to Lucia where she uses eyes which casts beams on the figure to symbolize the discriminatory stares on her by society, taking on the issue of gender discrimination. She is more subtle with her use of symbolism. Hence trough that, we can see the difference in terms of their personality where Frida has a strong character while Lucia has a weaker or gentler character. Frida is not afraid to bring her message across with strong and  symbols that creates a strong impact while Lucia prefers to use subtle images and gives the viewer some space to inject their own views and emotions.  












Sunday, August 12, 2012

Rene Magritte --- Personal Values


Personal values!
  This work depicts a room with familiar everyday grooming objects, commonly found in the bourgeois Blegian home, are arranged in a seetig seemingly ordinary. However the objects are not drawn to proportion, positioned in a seemingly accidental yet careful way. The room has walls with images of the clouds and sky, making the room look as if it is floating in the sky, drifting and there's a endless boundary. In the room, the only objects that is of proportion is the bed and armoire. She does not depit fantasy imagery, but sought t evoke the strangeness and ambiguity latent in reality. She depicts the relationships between the objects in a way that most will not, justaposition of unrelated imagery.
As for the symbols within the image, i believe all of us know it and i'm not going to repeat it~ so here's the website for the details:
http://www.sfmoma.org/explore/multimedia/interactive_features/53#
The unproportionate objects in the room are sized very close to a humans which makes the objects look like unwelcomed guests in the room. The unusually large scale of these objects forms an invasive presence who threatens our comfortable familiarity. The room also lacks a human touch, too neat and sterile. The objects also stands errily at attention, not welcoming at all.
However, for me, the reason this surreal painting catches my attention is due to the fact that it is painted in such a realistic way but in an impossible setting. The oversized objects makes our mind immediately classify it as unreal. However the detail in which it is painted so real, makes us hesitate and ask: is this really possible. And to me, this is what makes a painting truely surreal. The painting, almost photorealistic, from the perfect reflection of light on the wine glass and on the mirror, to the tiniest cracks on the celling, it make the impossible setting look very possible. I think this painting is the perfect example of a surreal painting and it is very sucessful in telling us its message. It uses very simple images just like a great story told in simple words. Less is more. The room in perfect proportion, perspective and scale keeps the painting balanced between the real and the unreal, making the painting surreal.

I wanted to cry while doing this work, because it took me four times just to get the picture taken... i had to do the setup four times after keeping all the objects back into its original spot 3 times!!!!!!! D:::::::: BUT ITS DONE NOWWWW FINALLYYYYYY

AND HERE'S MY WORKKKKKK
 i took the pictures with four different lightings
-edit- HEY THE PICTURE ACTUALLY MATCHES MY BLOG SKINNNNN

Normal room light

Lamp light
i like this the best!! The orange tint really suits the image

Room light from the right

All the lights!!!


This work is a photograph. Since i mentioned that Rene's work is very photorealistic, i thought why not make mine a photo? So i went around gathering objects that are of abnormal proportion and found these and i slowly built up my message as i found these objects. The background is actually an image made for the BJDs (ball-joint dolls) i had. So naturally, it is of a smaller size, made to fit the proportion of a doll round 60cm tall. I choose to use this background instead of my room is because ( it looks cooler) the single sofa/chair/couch represents the fact that im the only child in the family and sometimes because of that i feel loney, as shown by the dull gloomy mood of the background. The brown book would obviously represent studies and its one of the bigger objects. The bigger the object is, the more importance it is as of now. Together with the huge pencil, they both would refer to my studies and the importance of it. The pencil (just like Rene's wine glass) stands errily in the center, and you can say that sometimes, i dread studying and it is just unwelcomed like how the pencil looks out of place like an unwelcomed guest. The little dress at the back seems to be forgotten in a corner and this symbolizes my hobby---- cosplay!! It has been a very long time since i last cosplayed and i guess the little dress ( from my small BJD) would represent that this hobby of mine is now pushed back by other priorities. Next would be the tiny stack of books. Well if you look at it with the bigger book, you can say no matter how important you see studies as, big or small, its EVERYWHERE!!! And following that would be the small earphone (once again from my dolls) they symbolizes my love for music and how i cant go anywhere without my earphones. They are small hence also showing how little time i can spend listening to them now. Lastly, there is this tiny blue book ( a key chain) and tiny colour pencils ( these are real color pencils!! cute isnt it) . They represent my love to sketch and draw in my free time and since i dont have much of this free times anymore, it is slowly forgotten and left behind.... So this is a rough explanation of my work!!

And i know all of you are really interested in what it looks like behind  the scenes!!!!!

The magic shall be revealeddddd......
.
.
.
.
.
.

TAH-DAH!!!!

Its just a back-drop like thing stuck onto my wall with the funny sized objects placed on it~~ <33333

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Reptiles -- MC Escher




Video on an escher reptile!!!! 
10 adjectives to describe it:
  1. monochrome
  2. surreal
  3. symbolic
  4. mysterious
  5. rythm
  6. balance
  7. precise
  8. photorealistic
  9. eyemovement
  10. repetitive
Background:
Style: creates work in a paradoxical concept with little or no meaning
he often manupulates space and perspective to create optical illusions: creating impossible images that look plausible. The use of repeating motifs can be observed from the use of cycles and continuity of his work. he was facinated with mathematics. The precision that he uses allowed him to create such believable images.
Mood of the work: 
With the monochromatic colors and the lack of vibrant colors, this work looks gloomy and eerie and perhaps even give the viewer an ominous foreboding. the restless looking and seemingly slow crawling reptiles gives the work a very heavy mood with very little energy. however the bright light reflecting off the surface of the objects make it look maybe even a little hopeful. overall, the unmoving or slow moving objects makes the mood a little tense, still and silent or even serene. 

Description in term of elements of art and principle of design
The reptiles ( tessellated image or the realistic image) are traveling in a circular motion. This suggests the circle of life. There's one reptile crawling "into" the page, blending/ transforming/ changing/ fitting into the tessellated image of the reptiles within the pages of the book. this created an interplay between the flat and dimensional. The two lizards entering and leaving the tessellated plane provide clue that the picture is imaginative but fundamentally about the relationship between two and three dimensional space.  The image is so real yet so hard to believe that its true. Unconsciously, our mind tell us that this is possible. however consciously, our mind tells us that this is impossible! the open book with the reptiles on it looks as if this story of the cycle of reptiles is told to the viewer. and the images within the story is so realistic that it comes to life. However, the open bookis actually Escher's "visual dictionary" in which he systematically rcorded every system of interlocking figures. Every image in the work is carefully scaled and drawn to proportion and the right perspective. Escher took a great interest in geometry and what he called the "logic of space" . Tessellations, for Escher, became artistic explorations of math concepts.

what in my opinion makes this image surreal?
I feel that the fact that it cretes this illusion that makes the viewer question themselves of whether this image is real makes it surreal. Just like Renne Magritte's Personal Values, it is the notion where the viewer actually thinks for even that second that this work is real. Looking at Lucia Hartini's work, although it is surreal. With one look, the viewer can say that it is not possible that it is real. But surreal to me is the line between real and unreal. Hence with the reptiles crawling in a circle, almost like it is crawling between the three-dimensional and the two- dimensional world makes it surreal.
Artist Comparison
I am personally a fan of her's after i found out about her through the show " work of art " this show is really an inspiring show that i recommend to everyone!!!!!!!!
The first thing that caught my attention about her is this work that i found really beautiful and amazing:


Background:



Sarah Kabot is an artist who lives and works in Cleveland,
Ohio. Kabot creates installations, which are artworks created specifically for a certain space. Installation artists create an environment rather than an artwork that could be placed in any location. Sometimes an installation utilizes more than one of your five senses, like smelling
and seeing. To start, Kabot does drawings and sketches of the space she will be working in. Kabot’s process for creating her installations always involves questions. She wants to understand the way everyday objects such as an exit sign or light fixture are constructed. Kabot asks us to question what we think we know about the things we see every day. According to the artist, she is “acting out her imagination of other possibilities for things...what if the ceiling was face-up on the floor?” 



This is just like the staircase illusion Escher creates


i love how she plays with optical illusion with the help of shadows.


although this is a simple concept but it has a very amazing effect.


simple but complicated in a way. this is a mathematically precise installation.

the way she creates these optical illusion is , to me, very much like the illusion Escher creates. And the striking difference is of course Escher creates these three dimensional illusions on a two dimensional platform while she creates these illusions baised on a three dimensional object.
Unlike Escher, she did not create illusions that play between whats two dimensional and whats three dimensional, the precision an accuracy to create these realistic images or installations are very much like Escher's. It is just like an installation of Escher's work.

I think this is really cute!!!

Litography:
A very tedious process but with amazing results~~